• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Subscribe
  • RSS

Ex-CIA Chief Says Military Would Have to Disobey President Trump

Former CIA Director Michael Hayden notes that many of Donald Trump’s foreign policy positions are illegal. Salon‘s Brendan Gauthier:

“Real Time” host Bill Maher interviewed former NSA and CIA Director, General Michael Hayden.

Regarding his thoughts on a President Trump, Hayden said, “I would be incredibly concerned if a President Trump governed in a way that was consistent with the language that candidate Trump expressed during the campaign.”

Asked to elaborate on what he meant by “language,” Hayden cited Trump’s comments on “waterboarding and a whole lot more — because they deserve it” and killing the terrorists’ families.

“If he were to order that once in government, the American armed forces would refuse to act,” Hayden added. “That would be in violation of all international laws of armed combat.”

Again, because Trump is more carnival barker than serious politician, it’s easy to dismiss his bluster. He’s talking out of what graduates of the Airborne School know as his fourth point of contact, rather than making a reasoned policy stance. Presumably, an actual President Trump would listen to the Joint Chiefs and other advisors before issuing orders.

Still, pretty much every other thing that Trump says is of this sort: stupid, ill-advised, and completely out of step with legal and ethical norms. I keep hoping that this will catch up to him. Thus far, it seems to redound to his benefit.

Related Posts:

  • None Found

About James Joyner
James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway, an associate professor of security studies at the Marine Corps Command and Staff College, and a nonresident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer and Desert Storm vet. He earned a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. Views expressed here are his own. Follow James on Twitter.

Comments

  1. MBunge says:

    Uhh…like the military refused to allow torture when ordered by a previous GOP administration? Torture that to this day is still defended and justified by almost every other leading Republican?

    I genuinely wish I could get more upset and angry with Trump, but garbage like this instead makes me want to cheer him on as he burns the whole place down.

    Mike

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. MBunge says:

    From Wikipedia.

    In 2007, Hayden lobbied to allow the CIA to conduct drone strikes purely on the behavior of ground vehicles, with no further evidence of connection to terrorism.

    I fail to see how killing the families of terrorists is worse than killing people for no other reason than “they drive funny.”

    Mike

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. JKB says:

    @MBunge:

    Or spying on Americans, inside America, as happened when he was the head of NSA.

    And he’s certainly not been a supporter of Snowden.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Barry says:

    Seconding the others.

    I think that his statement is more of an inside-the-GOP move, against Trump.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. Andy says:

    @MBunge: When was the military ordered to torture? I think you’re confusing the military with the CIA.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. PJ says:

    Illegal or not, poll Republican Senators, Republican Representatives, and Republican voters, and you’ll would find out that way too many of them would approve of these things.

    @James Joyner:

    Presumably, an actual President Trump would listen to the Joint Chiefs and other advisors before issuing orders.

    Wishful thinking, but I assume that you’ll reach acceptance before November 8th.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. anjin-san says:

    @ James

    As others have pointed out, torture is pretty much an accepted policy in your party – a party you have chosen to remain associated with even as it spiraled downward twoards it’s present flirtation with fascism.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  8. Hal_10000 says:

    @Andy:

    Abu Ghraib was military. So was Bagram. Both were alleged to have originated from the military hierarchy or to have migrated from the torture program authorized at Gitmo.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  9. Andy says:

    @Hal_10000: The people involved with Abu Ghraib were prosecuted or fired. It clearly wasn’t authorized, so the military wasn’t ordered to do it.

    AFAIK, there wasn’t torture at GITMO, that took place at the CIA black sites.

    Point being, if the military is ordered to “torture” it would be an unlawful order, particularly since passage of the Detainee Treatment Act.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  10. Mike says:

    I always love it when an intellectual like Hayden weighs in

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGhcECnWRGM

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0